No on X Campaign’s Victory Statement

Bill Baber Undesignated Leave a Comment

Measure X failed with only 51.71% voter approval. The Measure needed 55% support to pass. The No on X Campaign thanks the voters of East County for rejecting this expensive and premature bond measure. We look forward to working with the District to bring back an improved and less expensive bond in 2018 or 2020 that will not include a …

Measure X: Money House vs. School Bond

Kevin Dayton Kevin Dayton Leave a Comment

Creating an Innovative Campaign Strategy to Oppose a Bond Measure: The Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Measure X Prototype by Kevin Dayton California voters approved bond measures for K-12 school and community college districts at a 90% rate in the November 2015 off-year election and June 2016 primary presidential election. This is a record rate of passage for bond measures since …

Measure X at Grossmont-Cuyamaca College District is NOT what it seems

Bill Baber Bill Baber Leave a Comment

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Administrators tell voters: Measure X will reduce the cost of college. But they don’t tell voters: Skyrocketing college costs are driven in large part by the growth in the number of college administrators. New buildings will not reduce the cost of administration. They tell voters: Measure X will build a new Workforce Training Center. But they don’t tell voters: …