Issa or Campa-Najjar: Who Really Represents the District’s Values?

 A conservative Latino’s view on politics…

PART VI of my series on Campa-Najjar.

CAMPA-NAJJAR SUPPORTS BANNING GUNS

Ammar Campa-Najjar owns guns and claims he’s a proponent of the 2nd Amendment, and I believe him, but there are levels of belief politicians use to make that statement.

In other words, they have rules on how far the Second Amendment should extend to us as they fully exploit their rights to protect themselves.

ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN

My primary concern is Campa-Najjar’s knowledge. When someone tweets, the following:

• “I was for the assault weapons ban Peters supports, Josh wasn’t for example.” Ammar Campa-Najjar on banning guns, 4/30/2018

Assault weapons is a term created by the Democratic Party. From the New York Times:

• “This politically defined category of guns — a selection of rifles, shotguns, and handguns with “military-style” features.”
  • No specific firearm is listed; thus, we can assume Campa-Najjar can and will go along to confiscate whatever gun Democrats want under the guise of “assault weapons.”

Here’s the issue – Democrats use this term to confuse and misrepresent the public, specifically to take advantage to classify guns. Enter legislatures that take it on themselves to label which guns are assault weapons. One criterion they use – pick what’s popular with the goal of taking as much of our #2A rights away – with the help of activist judges.

Look at the statement of what is an assault weapon – “military style features.” They use the aesthetic features of a firearm to ban them. Does the AR-15 ring a bell?

• Democrats won’t hesitate to take full advantage of the Second Amendment while stripping us of this Constitutional right and Campa-Najjar’s statement shows he’d do the same.

Do we want someone who doesn’t understand what a gun is or purposely uses a purposely flawed definition to tell us what firearms we can own? No, we don’t!

Campa-Najjar should know better. Thus, we can only assume his statement shows the Campa-Najjar we will have as a politician versus what he’s telling us. A moderate or conservative won’t recognize that definition as legitimate, but a Democrat leftist does.

DIANNE FEINSTEIN and ALYSSA MILANO

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) once held a concealed carry permit to protect herself after becoming a target of the “New World Liberation Front.” Rightfully so, she fulfilled her rights to the Second Amendment. However, after making it to Congress, she changed, supporting one gun law after another that would strip our Second Amendment rights. All the while, she travels with armed security.

Alyssa Milano is an ardent antigun, anti-second-amendment activist – well, she’s an overall leftist activist. She would have us live by her rules that take our second amendment rights while she uses them to protect herself. Her hypocrisy is beyond redemption, as the following example shows:

• Milano went to an antigun rally – No Rifle Association (NoRA) with armed security.

Just because Campa-Najjar own’s guns and states he’s a believer in the Second Amendment doesn’t mean he won’t vote to limit our #2A rights – look at Feinstein and Milano.

CAMPA-NAJJAR WOULD TAKE OUR GUNS!

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to conclude the following:

1. When you use the term “assault weapons ban” to predicate laws to limit the Second Amendment, you don’t know firearms.
2. Just because you own a firearm doesn’t’ mean you want us or will allow us to.
3. History has shown, Democrats abuse the term “assault weapons” for one reason – to make everyday guns illegal.

The examples I mentioned aren’t the exception but the norm with Campa-Najjar’s Democratic Party.

SWALWELL, ANTI-GUN ZEALOT AND CAMPA-NAJJAR ENDORSER

One of the worst full-blown, antigun rights zealots and a far-left Democrat leftist, Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA), endorsed Campa-Najjar. Sadly, he’s better known for passing gas on national television, but this Campa-Najjar supporter has too many shocking antigun beliefs:

• “Police Don’t Need More Than Ten Rounds,”
  • The police already handicapped with weaponry criminals can buy illegally will die if this vicious antigun zealot gets his way. He’s willing to handicap law-enforcement, resulting in more deaths and destruction by criminals. In essence, he’s empowering and protecting criminals against law-enforcement. What’s this say about Campa-Najjar?
• “It would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes.“
  • Swalwell said this about the government forcing citizens to give up their guns and what he sees in a Civil War started by government abuse and overreach. What does that state about Swalwell, and how he views Americans? What’s it state about Campa-Najjar?
• “She’s not lying. We should ban assault weapons by buying them back or restricting them to ranges/clubs. #EnoughIsEnough”
  • Swalwell and Campa-Najjar use the term “assault weapons” for one purpose – to take our guns.

These are well-known Democratic Party tactics to mislabel weapons purposely. It’s a way around the Second Amendment and how they’re slowly stripping us of our rights. That’s not even mentioning the cost to get a gun that’s purposely damaging to the poor.

DARRELL ISSA – SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS DEFENDER

However, we know Darrell Issa is a defender of the Second Amendment. He has an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association (NRA) and has a positive voting record in defending our rights. Issa may have faults, but at least I know his voting record with the Second Amendment.

If you believe in the Second Amendment, there’s no doubt who your vote should go to.

Continue to PART VII of my series on Campa-Najjar.