Unacceptable Tax Hikes in California

B-Daddy B-Daddy 4 Comments

Share

A few days ago, I read Richard Rider’s detailed post about how truly awful the California tax burden is.  A quick refresher.

California has the 3rd worst state income tax in the nation. 9.3% tax bracket starts at $46,766 for people filing as individuals. 10.3%
tax starts at $1,000,000 http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/bp59_es.pdf (election likely later this year to again raise these rates)

Highest state sales tax rate in the nation. 7.25% (as of 1 July). 7% is next highest (does not include local sales taxes) http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/bp60.pdf Table #15.

California corporate income tax rate (8.84%) is the highest west of the Mississippi (our economic competitors) except for Alaska.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/bp59.pdf

Table #8 — we are 8th highest nationwide.

So imagine my surprise disgust, when I picked up this morning’s paper to see this headline (article not yet available on line).

BROWN TO SEEK TAX-HIKE INITIATIVE

Not only is this a tax the rich scheme, but everyone will suffer with a half-cent sales tax increase. Apparently not content to be merely third worst in the nation for income tax rates, state politicians appear to want to be number one in both income taxation and sales taxation.  Further tax increases are proposed:

  • Additional 1.0% for filers over $250,000 income.
  • Additional 1.5% for filers over $300,000 income.
  • Additional 2.0% for filers over $500,000 income.

Meanwhile California continues to lag in job creation.  Who is going to have the money to invest in new jobs?  For example, a single small business owner who makes $1.5 million per year would see a tax increase of $23,500.  That is the entire salary of one minimum wage worker, and it is small business owners who are usually the millionaires who create jobs. 

The sales tax is only going to hurt businesses as well, as all consumers will get less for their money and will end up spending less.  The end result is always that such increases end up generating less revenue than static analysis would indicate.

Meanwhile, Governor Brown and the legislature have done nothing to reform California pensions.  So here are my demands regarding state employees and their pensions before such a proposal should even make the ballot.  The Governor has proposed pension reform, but has not delivered.  Any tax hike is dead on arrival until more cuts are implemented, starting with pension reform.  Some key issues:

Brown wants to ask voters to increase the retirement age for future state and local government workers and require all employees to contribute at least half of their annual pension costs. And that’s just for starters.

Some other reform proposals can be found here.

  • Anti-spiking provisions, including a tighter definition of “base pay” to eliminate all the abusive overtime and non-recurring and special pay features that bloat pensions, plus a three-year averaging process which is conventional in many other states.
  • No more retroactive benefits increases — a hot button for pension reformers, because such ‘retros’ never actually “attract and retain employees” which has been the traditional baloney we’ve been fed for years about those giveaways. SB 400 in California was the millennial poster child for the failure of this selfish gambit which has since been discredited by the professional associations. . . .
  • No more employer pension-contribution holidays. Just look at Illinois for proof positive on this one. When politicians cut corners in pension funding, the results are predictably disastrous. Californians need only look at CalSTRS, the state teacher’s system, for a classic example of the systematic failure of legislative underfunding.
  • Felons would be ineligible for public pensions related to their government employment. This feature will win votes every time after Bell, Calif.’s compensation scandals.
  • No more “air time,” or purchasing service credits for time never worked in the first place.

Further, the state needs to implement a pay freeze, like the federal government has done, for all state  employees.  The state has a long way to go before they should be asking the tax payers for more money.  This ballot measure will be spark another surge in activism by those sympathetic to tea party goals in this state.

Share

Comments 4

  1. Many thanks for putting this up, B-Daddy. This tax increase is madness!

    A minor suggestion — whenever you quote from my fact sheet, be aware that it’s a moving target — I update this sucker twice a month or more. I encourage folks to go to my blog for the most recent version when putting out data.

    That being said, the factoids you highlighted are still essentially the same, so no matter in this case.

  2. One other factor to consider concerning the higher sales tax — it’s a further inducement for consumers to avoid the sales tax all together.

    Not only through the Internet, but also by buying in lower tax states when traveling, buying in Mexico (sometimes cheaper), and — for many San Diegans — buying at the military stores where no sales tax is charged.

    Putting our private sector CA retailers at a further competitive disadvantage is hardly the kind of economic stimulus our state needs.

  3. Post
    Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *