SD Supervisors decide to starve the poor

Richard Rider, Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters Richard Rider, Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters 8 Comments

Share

San Diego County Supervisors decide to starve the old, the disabled and the homeless

New restaurant food stamp program likely will leave these unfortunate people without food two weeks every month

by Richard Rider, Chairman
San Diego Tax Fighters
Phone 858-530-3027
11 January, 2011
For Immediate Release

San Diego – Today the San Diego County Supervisors voted to starve the most vulnerable people in the county. It’s a classic case of the passage of the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Lawmakers feel that passing more laws is what they get paid for. Apparently thinking things through is not part of their job description.

Here’s their “plan.”  With the best of intentions, our county supervisors have decided that some people receiving food stamps have trouble fixing a hot meal. So without increasing the food stamp allotment, they blithely voted to let such disadvantaged folks buy meals in restaurants with the food stamp card.

Let me be blunt. By and large, people on food stamps (now renamed CalFresh – sounds like some room freshener) have a problem getting the food stamp money to last until the end of the month. Most are not good money managers. It’s likely that the folks getting the restaurant option are as fiscally unskilled as the average food stamp recipient – if not more so.

Buying a meal – even at McDonald’s or other fast food restaurant – costs 3-5 times more than buying similar food at a grocery store. If the average food stamp recipient already runs out of food money before the end of the month, guess what’s going to happen when they start eating in restaurants? That’s right – depending on the frequency of dining out, such recipients likely will be out of funds 10 days to 2 weeks into the month.

Proponents argue that they just want to offer such folks hot meals. But my question is this: Which is better – cold meals, or NO meals?

In part, this program is based on a false premise – that these unfortunate recipients don’t have access to hot meals. Sometimes true, but often not.

There are soup kitchens, churches and other charities offering hot meals. For seniors, there’s the Meals on Wheels program. Many of the disabled have assistance available from government, or from family and friends.

Supervisor Ron Roberts is quoted as saying that this could be “a live-saving program.” Really? Show me the stats on the county food stamp recipients who starved to death in the last ten years – or who died for the lack of hot meals. I suspect the number is zero.

Hunger can be a real problem. The county supervisors just inadvertently increased its likely frequency in the future.

The irony is that the professional advocates for these unfortunates are celebrating this “victory.” Some victory.

–30–

Share

Comments 8

  1. “Overheard” on Twitter…

    @musiccaab I’m always struck by the deliberate ignorance of people who talk about all the options for poor people to get food.

    @citybeatkelly Nice way to start the day: by reading an ignorant, offensive @sandiegorostra post

  2. Post
    Author
  3. Check your twitter feed. I offered two rebuttals based on fact that you’ve yet to respond to. But, I guess it’s easier to mislead people, ain’t it?

  4. Is anyone surprised that someone defending the expansion of food stamps uses “ain’t” in a political discussion?

  5. In all fairness, we’re pretty sure the use of ain’t was purposeful. Ain’t it?

    Jes’ sayin’.

  6. I’m troubled by the Board of Supervisors’ decision for completely different reasons than my Libertarian colleague. Yikes, this sounds like I’m a member of Congress teeing up to slam another member of Congress. Nevertheless…

    I take issue with the assertion that fast food meals are “three to five times more expensive” than buying food at a grocery store. With dollar menus and value menus everywhere and constantly in our face, impoverished Americans can feed a family very inexpensively and with zero fuss. If you can work an extra hour instead of cooking a meal and make your kids happy with a burger or pizza, you’d probably make that trade-off.

    The problem is people have a hard time eating in a healthy way when they constantly consume this stuff, so-called “healthy choices” aside. The rate of obesity among lower-income Americans is hideously high, and this costs us as a society far more in health care costs than in food assistance.

  7. Post
    Author

    Kelly, post your rebuttals here. No meaningful debate can occur on Twitter. You can then Twitter the debate.

    BTW, I was in Sacramento yesterday attending (and briefly speaking at) the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Summit Meeting. Groups large and small from all over the state attended. Good gathering. And well-attended Sacramento press conference.

    We’ll be gearing up to fight Jerry Brown’s planned June tax increase special ballot. Based on the results of the Prop 1A tax increase special election of 2009, it looks like we’re gonna kick some Democrat backsides. As we recall, that tax went down by an almost 2-1 margin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *