After A Humiliating Defeat, The Anti-Krvaric Faction Disintegrates

Mr. MurphyMr. Murphy 10 Comments

Share

Every war comes to an end, and the war over control of the Republican Central Committee that has heatedly flared, on and off for the past two years, is over. In the last four days, in a sweeping route, Republican Chairman Tony Krvaric’s ‘organization’ has emerged wholly victorious over what became an ever shrinking, and every more bizarre, collection of malcontents.

Witness last week’s anonymous email, which accused Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring and Tony Krvaric of a variety of crimes. The result? A Sacramento Bee investigation and article which, from most perspectives, all but said “there is nothing there.” A loss of credibility for the malcontents.

Witness the anonymous email over the weekend, which again made the accusation and gave the Monday night Central Committee meeting as the time and place all the sundry details would be rolled out. The result? No press conference, no evidence. Further loss of credibility for the clearly deranged anonymous writer, and probably a criminal and/or civil suit.

Witness the Monday night Central Committee, which saw one of the most active of the malcontents removed from the committee by a 44 to 1 vote. The result? A demonstration of raw votes that made it clear to even the most doubtful observer that the Krvaric team had the votes they needed to control the committee.

Witness the resignations of the malcontent ringleaders and their appointees from the Republican Party today. The result? With the resignation of two of the major ringleaders and their appointees there is not enough of a malcontent organization to matter. The fight is over.

This happened quick. It was worth watching in some detail…

(“hmmm… the reader asks, Mr. Murphy, uses the male gender when referring to the anonymous emailer. Does that mean he knows the person is a male, or is he just using proper English?” That’s a very good question. I’ve found when a losing faction is disintegrating,  some people want to be reaccepted and are willing to make all sort of information trades… or maybe already have. Sleep well, “anonymous” and think about the ramifications if your words are tied to your name.)

Share

Comments 10

  1. It’s not over. The person who sent those emails, again today, needs to be identified and sued.

    Really, I don’t care who won or who lost I don’t follow all this that closely. What I care about is that someone has been intentionally defaming individuals and probably harming the party in the process.

  2. There are actually a few ways of finding out who is behind a gmail account. In my work, I’ve had to do it a dozen times. Who should I contact to help?

  3. Anyone one with a brain knew it was Kevin. Everyone in the party, even the so-called malcontents, want the Party to succeed. However, true leaders do not take heavy handed jack booted tactics well. The sheep on the Central committee are not doing the Party a favor by enabling Tony. Have a good laugh as the County turns blue, but, I guess they can always blame it on the Kooks and malcontents. There was plenty of blame to go around after the Boling and 78th losses. Who is going to take the blame for the 2nd and 6th Council District losses looming on the horizon.

  4. Didn’t Boling lose like 49.5 to 50.5 and Crimmins lose like 28.5 to 71.5 (well below the gop registration). Who is to blame for all that?

  5. Thanks to the 44 for settling this mess once and for all. Finally, I can attend RCCC meetings and contribute to the process without having to deal with backbiting loonies. They are the reason good people stayed away. 2010 will be a great year for rebuilding and victory.

  6. There allegedly was a meeting last night concerning these emails. A few people who I would call “dissenters” were there with a great deal of paperwork… mostly saved emails. There were three attorneys present.

    One question I just thought up: if “anonymous'” employer KNEW he was distributing these emails on company time, is the employer also liable in civil or criminal court? I’m not sure, but it sure would make sense.

    JM

  7. Lawsuits are coming, lots of them. Against 2008 & 2010 candidates, former staff, ‘anonymous” & his company and more.

    One of the best things about all of this being so public is that it creates a wonderful paper trail for the lawyers.

  8. (This comment was removed by the site admin as potential libel. The commenter with the fake email address doesn’t know the difference between facts and allegations, and was making possible libelous statements about an individual as statements of fact. This violates the rules of this site. Allegations of a personal nature must include proof to even be considered for inclusion on Rostra.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.