UT San Diego: Nathan Fletcher in his own words

Nathan FletcherNathan Fletcher 5 Comments

Share

From this morning’s UT San Diego:

“Does this mean compromise is an end in itself? No. There is no compromise when it comes to the public interest or protecting taxpayers. Will we always agree? Of course not. Bold ideas will have opposition. Will everyone get what they want? Not a chance. But that doesn’t mean you can’t work for solutions that preserve our basic principles while taking into account the legitimate interests of others.

I stand up today and state that I will not exclude anyone from joining my campaign based on ideological litmus tests. I welcome support from anyone who shares my vision for our city. That is my only test.”

Read the full editorial here or below:

Fletcher explains his views, actions

By Nathan Fletcher

Saturday, April 28, 2012

I. An independent mayor

My decision to leave partisan politics was rooted in a growing frustration with what party politics has become today – less a commitment to principles than a cynical exercise in playing political games to win elections. Leaders should never compromise their core values in pursuit of getting something done. But they should have the independence and willingness to work towards solutions that move us forward.

Those who have followed my career know I have defined my time in elected office by turning principles into action. We passed legislation by building bipartisan coalitions around shared goals. We negotiated in good faith and overcame opposition to deliver results that put people back to work, ensured access to healthcare, improved public safety, protected and preserved our environment and built a better future.

As mayor, I will continue this approach, which has helped me become one of the most effective legislators in our state.

II. Marine Corps values

My core values were shaped by growing up in a working-class family and sharpened by my service in combat as a Marine. I’m offended by the suggestion that leaving the Republican Party is somehow analogous to breaking a Marine’s pledge of fidelity to country. Our pledge should not be to party politics, it should be to the people we represent.

My principles and my positions on the key issues facing our city have not changed since I made the decision to become an independent. I support Comprehensive Pension Reform and will implement all parts of it. I continue to support Managed Competition as a tool to make delivery of city services more efficient, and I continue to believe local governments should have the ability to contract for construction services based solely on the best quality and value for taxpayers.

III. Compromise consistent with principles

To translate ideas into action takes a leader who can work with people.

Does this mean compromise is an end in itself? No. There is no compromise when it comes to the public interest or protecting taxpayers. Will we always agree? Of course not. Bold ideas will have opposition. Will everyone get what they want? Not a chance. But that doesn’t mean you can’t work for solutions that preserve our basic principles while taking into account the legitimate interests of others.

I stand up today and state that I will not exclude anyone from joining my campaign based on ideological litmus tests. I welcome support from anyone who shares my vision for our city. That is my only test.

As your mayor, nobody will be tougher in negotiating labor agreements that protect taxpayers or in negotiating development agreements that protect our quality of life. But unlike my opponents, I will not treat either side like an enemy or exclude them from being part of a solution because of past disagreements.

IV. A mayor for all San Diego

I know what answers the U-T San Diego was seeking today. However, I have never been someone who tells people what they want to hear. I say what I believe, for better or worse. I can only be who I am.

San Diegans have a clear choice in this election. Two of my opponents have defined their career by focusing on who is to blame for the problems we face, and who shouldn’t be a part of the solution. The tone, temperament, leadership style and vision for our city make each candidate unique and offer clear contrasts.

I offer a new approach: tested in battle, trusted by those with whom I’ve worked, and committed to following an independent course to protect the public interest.

I will be an independent mayor for all of San Diego. I will not be beholden to any group, but will always be willing to work with anyone to find areas of agreement and solutions that move our city moving forward.

Fletcher, a member of the state Assembly, is an independent candidate for mayor of San Diego.

Share

Comments 5

  1. Hey Nathan-

    Would you have remained with the Republican party if they had endorsed you over Carl?

    My apologies if this question has already been answered.

  2. This is what Fletcher told the LA times today:

    “Who knows? We could play a never-ending game of hypotheticals. This is something I’ve struggled with for a long time. You can only be told so many times that to have successful politics you have to learn how to play the game before it suddenly clicks: My goal in life is not successful partisan politics. My goal is to do good things.”

    This is what he told the SDGOP, five weeks ago:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsFZkNmm2v8

    If after listening to his speech, it seems like Mr Fletcher, the former political director of the California Republican Party, is suffering from sort of schizophrenia, I assure you that he’s quite sane. He simply suffers a situational attack of opportunistic duplicity.

  3. “I know what answers the U-T San Diego was seeking today. However, I have never been someone who tells people what they want to hear. I say what I believe, for better or worse. I can only be who I am.”

    Really???? I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.

  4. As I read this problem all I can think of is…

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ct6x_lesley-gore-sunshine-lollipops-rain_music

    What does any of this MEAN!!???

    He won’t compromise but he won’t exclude? Everyone is welcome if you share HIS vision of the future? He won’t compromise but recognizes the legitimacy of the other sides’ ideas (if they are legitimate why WOULDN’T you compromise?).

    There is a stark choice in this election. Candidates on the left and right who you know what you are getting and a third who at least has MANAGED a big organization. Then we have the campaign of personality – who has never managed more than squad of Marines and has ZIP experience in urban municipal affairs. Thank goodness I live in the unincorporated area. If only I had a flying car so I could avoid the goat trails the City of San Diego calls roads.

  5. Nathan didn’t move away from the County Party…the County Party moved away from him, and from many of us who remember the old days when we used to be the majority party in San Diego County

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.