OK. So how did your ol’ pal, Bob do with some of yesterday’s predictions? For starters, since Massachusetts 2010 was almost as history making as Massachusetts 1776, with an election landslide for Scott Brown, liberal Democrats are finding it more difficult to play the “election fraud allegation” wild card. As Hugh Hewitt so perfectly describes this phenomenon, “If it isn’t close, they can’t cheat.”
Well, the election was not close, and so, we are being spared the usual mantras. If I wanted, I could simply erase yesterday’s blog predictions, but unlike many of the people who are teaching in our universities, I am not a believer in historical revision. And so, I leave that blog up for posterity.
That is not to say that no fraud charges are being brought about at all. The Coakley campaign did hold a press conference claiming they were made privy to reports of voters being issued ballots pre-marked for Scott Brown. Unfortunately for Miss Coakley, her press release was dated yesterday, before the polls were even opened. (Andrew Brieitbart’s Big Government, 1-20-10)
As for other concerns and predictions in yesterday’s blog, time will tell.
Bob Siegel is a weekend radio talk show host on KCBQ and columnist. Details of his show can be found at www.bobsiegel.net. Comments to posts are discussed by Bob over the air where anyone is free to call in and respond/debate. Call in toll free number: 1-888-344-1170
Comments 2
Bob, you may not be as prescient as the Coakley campaign, but you are still pretty omniscient!
Author
Thanks Greg:)