Governor to San Diego: Tax yourselves or else!

Tony Manolatos Tony Manolatos 3 Comments


Cross-posted at FlashReport

San Diego Politics & Media Mashup

If you believe Governor Jerry Brown, all of us are going to suffer if we don’t agree to tax ourselves more this November.

It’s a tired sales pitch we hear too often from California lawmakers, but that didn’t stop Brown from trying to play on our fears when he visited San Diego on Monday.

The first paragraph in the U-T San Diego’s story on Brown’s press conference framed the governor’s hyperbole this way:

Jerry Brown on Monday in San Diego peddled his tax measure to raise $6 billion annually for education and other state services, promising “real suffering by you and really our whole future” if the proposal fails in November.

There is a lot I admire about the governor, but he is on the wrong side of this issue and his messaging isn’t exactly the stuff of legend.

Maybe no one told him San Diegans aren’t wild about the tax-yourselves-or-else approach.

Two years ago, Proposition D, a proposed sales tax increase, failed miserably in San Diego. The Yes on D folks told voters early and often that if they did not vote for the tax hike they would not be as safe because there would be police and fire department cuts. Those cuts never materialized. In fact, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders recently announced the city’s structural deficit is a thing of the past.

I checked with a reporter to see what the impact would be in San Diego if voters reject Governor Brown’s tax plan. I was told the alternative gaining the most traction is a simple one — labor-backed school board members would move to try and shorten the school year by two weeks.

That’s not good news. Hardly the stuff I picture, however, when I think of real suffering.

Tony Krvaric, the local GOP chair, had a slightly different take.

“Do I hear 4 weeks? Any takers for 5? #gimmeabreak #mafiatactics #unionthuggery” he tweeted.

Despite the critics, I don’t expect Brown’s ominous talking points to change much as he crisscrosses the state trying to convince Californians to support Proposition 30. So expect to hear more of this:

  • This is not only important, it’s vital. Without it, all of us will suffer.
  • I mean it. All of us are going to suffer. I can’t stress that enough. There will be great suffering.
  • This really is a tax on the rich.
  • We’ve made great strides in Sacramento since I took office.
  • Help me help you.

Here is what you won’t hear the governor say:

  • California is bleeding jobs because it’s one of the least business-friendly states in the nation.
  • He can’t get Democrats in Sacramento to agree on substantive pension reform.
  • Officials recently discovered the parks department was operating with a hidden surplus of $54 million.

On Monday, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association released a radio ad highlighting the parks department’s hidden surplus. The ad is called, “What else are they keeping from you?” It ends by encouraging listeners to sign an online petition to demand reforms, not higher taxes, from the governor and legislature.

Brown’s visit to San Diego lit up Twitter and Facebook, and the responses I saw were less than encouraging.

“Real story is Sacramento failed yet again to pass a balanced budget. Prop. 30 won’t fix that,” tweeted Jeffrey Barker.

On Facebook, KOGO’s LaDona Harvey wrote: “Just spoke with California Governor Jerry Brown about his tax increase ballot initiative. He is glib, and he is nice…and I am still not voting for it! Clean up the house first, Sacramento!”

Tony Manolatos is a communications strategist. You can follow him on Twitter or LinkedInYou can hear Tony talk politics and media with KOGO’s LaDona Harvey every Monday at 2:35 p.m. on AM 600 and FM 95.7.

Comments 3

  1. Yesterday I did a debate on this Prop 30 topic on KPBS radio and TV (actually two debates). You might find them of interest.

    Go to the link below, and you’l find both the TV and radio embedded links. The TV interview is 5 minutes, while the meatier radio debate is 18 minutes (debate starts 3 minutes into podcast).

    You can safely ignore the one-sided article itself. But, oddly enough, the comments below the article on this liberal website/station are more balanced — an unusual occurrence, given the station’s liberal audience.

  2. The blackmail is obvious in this measure. School districts have been told to continue spending AS IF the RETROACTIVE Prop 30 tax increase will pass in November. Odds are, it won’t (the last EIGHT such statewide tax increases failed).

    Hence the school cutbacks will be more Draconian, as the districts will have already spent themselves into a deep fiscal hole. Schools WILL close early in May. And it’s intentional.

    This leaves no doubt who the schools are run for — for the EMPLOYEES, not the STUDENTS and the taxpayers. A more heartless policy is hard to envision.

  3. I hope you correct Mr. Rider that the voters will turn this (as well as the others) down, but they will be using the mantra ‘it’s for the chiiiiillldrenn’ even though 40% of the state budget already goes to schools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.