County Redistricting – Response to Steve Danon

Supervisor Pam Slater-Price Supervisor Pam Slater-Price 3 Comments

Share

As I have already made clear, I support the implementation of an independent commission to redraw county supervisorial lines.

The difference between me and Steve Danon, who wrote to the North County Times about this issue, is that he tries to write commentaries that leave out facts in the hopes that you won’t find out what he omitted.

And although I more than welcome debates that revise policies for the better, political posturing in the form of commentaries like his that overlook points of fact, are useless.

First of all, Danon is very good at omission. He said that I have had plenty of time to establish this commission. Well, let’s be clear, so has he.

Danon has worked for elected officials for nearly 20 years.  He worked on staff for two county supervisors. Yet not once did he bring forward the idea of an independent commission.

He worked for Supervisor Ron Roberts in 2001 during the last redistricting. Not once did he work to bring forward an independent commission.

In fact, he did not advise his supervisor to vote against the blatant Gerrymandering of 2001. At that time, political jockeying carved huge chunks out of District 3. He did not object to the adoption of that map. Hard to believe that he omitted all these points. As a staffer and long-time lobbyist he should know better.

Maybe he thought he should focus more on creating an ethics commission. This way they could review why he is able to run for office seemingly full time on the taxpayer dime while working for a congressman. In fact, his boss’ district as of August 15 no longer includes the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas, or Escondido, where he spends a lot of his time.

Another fact:  Danon has been in the district campaigning during key votes in Washington, D.C.   Even more galling is that taxpayers pay for his flights between Washington, D.C. and San Diego. He should be ordered to reimburse those flights out of his own pocket.

But that aside, establishing an Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission is an idea that has been around a long time.

However, Paragraph 21500 of the state Elections Code applies to all 58 counties in California and states that the Boards of Supervisors “shall adjust the boundaries of any or all of the supervisorial districts of the county.”

In other words, the Legislature has set counties’ redistricting policy and only the Legislature or a statewide voter initiative can undo it.

In his commentary, Danon also criticizes my action to initiate the 2011 redistricting process. Of course, he knows that both the chair and vice chair as a matter of historic protocol sign the initial board letter to initiate the redistricting process. That business was non-controversial and passed on consent.  Danon did not appear before the Board of Supervisors to express his outrage. The chair and vice chair did the same thing in 2001. Danon never pleaded with them not to do it.

He failed to mention any of this. More glaring omissions of the facts.

In this round of redistricting, an advisory panel hosted a dozen public meetings throughout the county to gather public input. The committee posted its maps and findings online and welcomed all feedback. The public had ample opportunity to weigh in.

While Congress has worked recently on weekends to debate the debt ceiling and the federal deficit, Danon stumps for supervisor in San Diego County and writes commentaries on campaign issues – all while getting paid by us. It’s worse than when he ran unsuccessfully for San Diego City Council against Donna Frye. Back then he omitted things, too, including initially refusing to release his SDSU transcripts where his grades included an F and a D in political science. Evidently, he did not want voters to know that he was on probation for two full academic years.

The perils of gerrymandering pale by comparison to this guy. Seeing him in any elected office should be more frightening to the public than the latest Stephen King novel.

Pam Slater-Price represents District 3 on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.

This commentary also appeared in the North County Times

Share

Comments 3

  1. Pam Slater-Price has just shown her true character as a petty, tiresome politician.

    A. Pam voted in favor of the 2001 redistricting , yet she blames her 2012 challenger for her votes? It doesn’t make sense. The truth is, she’s had 20 years and two opportunities and nothing’s changed.

    B. It’s obvious she doesn’t understand her job. To create an independent commission for redistricting, the county charter needs to be changed by a local initiative and state legislation – not a state-wide initiative.

    C. Unlike County redistricting, which takes effect immediately upon their final vote, congressional districts and representation remain as they are until January, 2013 (after the next general election).

    D. Seriously, attacking him on his grades at SDSU 25 years ago. Seriously?

    Then, why is Pam so upset with challenger Steve Danon that she has to lash-out with such ridiculous and non-sensical claims?

    Because he exposed that she funneled millions of tax dollars to entertainment groups in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars worth of free gifts, tickets and travel, including an all-expense-paid two week vacation to Vienna, Austria to see the Vienna Boys’ Choir. She was charged with 26 violations by the Fair Political Practices Commission for failing to disclose the free gifts and tickets and was fined thousands of dollars. Then she used her campaign funds to pay her fines and attorney fees.

    But that isn’t her only corruption; Pam Slater Price let the efforts to retroactively spike her own pension, contributing to more than $1 billion in debt and draining more than $200 million per year from County services.

    If that wasn’t bad enough, she wrote a proposal to increase her own salary by 25 percent, and when it failed, she voted to raise her “car allowance” to $12,000 per year, adding it to her salary and further spiking her own pension.

    She has got to go…

  2. All politicos are petty and soon beome entrenched and tiresome. However Slater did no harm, and followed a good crew of board members. Roberts is a gem of gems, as he will always buck the grain and honor those entitled to the honor. Steve Danon will do the same. Once Steve learns compassion, he will glow in the political spectrum. Steve must be aware of the staff he will accrue. We all know who I talk of. Steve will bitch slap those in need of slapping.

    Pam may now spend her time powdering her ruby red lips and get on with life. Steve Danon will bring a sea change to San Diego. Donna Frye brought a sea change to san diego but the water was polluted, and she was over her head. Dynamic lady but Donna Dont Surf,and neither did Slater.

    With Filner as mayor, and a solid core on the board, San Diego may weather the upcomming storm.

  3. Speak in platitudes much?

    We would respectfully ask that commenters check their spelling, grammar and punctuation before posting. We spend an inordinate amount of time correcting the errors of only a small handful of commenters. We will simply consider disapproving those few from posting in the future, if they can’t check their own work, rather than spending time doing so ourselves. This includes spelling names correctly, and placing a space after a comma prior to the next word in a sentence. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.