Anchor baby issue solved – a Congressional definition change to the word BORN

Kimberly DvorakKimberly Dvorak 1 Comment

Share

With the immigration issue swirling about the country, Arizona being slapped with lawsuits and Mexico drug cartel violence exploding south of the border, many are beginning to have adult conversations about the impact of illegal immigration within U.S. borders.

Every year there are approximately 300,000 to 400,000 children born in America to illegal immigrant parents. As such, the children automatically get the golden ticket – citizenship and all the benefits that come with being an American. Of course babies cannot take care of themselves so their parents must now gain some sort of legal status to care for their infant child.

The political birthright or anchor baby controversy has been debated for many years and only after the Arizona SB1070 crackdown on illegal immigration has it been brought back to the forefront.

Legislation aimed at changing the 14th Amendment and the scope of birthright citizenship has been debated in many Congressional sessions but failed to gain any real traction.

According to legal experts, when the definition of the word born (in the 14th Amendment) is challenged, aside from a Justice William O’Douglas footnote, the only legislative history refers to Negro populations for purposes of counting for Congressional districts.

There has not and was not any debate during the 14th Amendment process or thereafter as to the meaning of the word “born.” The reason being was that former slaves were already considered citizens for purposes of determining Congressional districts and representation.

Keep reading

Share

Comments 1

  1. A definition change to the word “born?” I didn’t know Bill Clinton was a contributor to this site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.