Restoring Neighborhood Services Must Include Investments in Public Safety

Carl DeMaioCarl DeMaio 2 Comments


It’s no secret that the last decade has forced all city departments to make cuts in order to balance our city budget.  In many cases the cuts did not impact core services – in fact they highlighted how bloated some city departments had become.

But when it comes to our communities, the impacts of these service cuts can be clearly seen.  We are reminded of our crumbling infrastructure as we drive down our streets, as we pay our rising water bills, and suffer reduced hours at libraries and community centers.

In other areas, the cuts in service levels are not clearly seen, yet may have a more devastating impact on individuals.  Does it surprise you that police dispatchers communicate with our officers on a 25-year-old dispatch system?  The system has become unreliable, putting officers at risk and creating challenges to providing timely responses.

A new modern system will allow for greater integration with other public safety agencies and faster coordination when the most serious emergencies arise.

This is one example of the type of strategic investment necessary to provide effective and efficient responses to the needs of our community.

We also must address our recruitment and retention issues at the Police Department.  There are almost 100 less sworn police officers today then there were in 2007. During the next five years, the Department has identified the need to restore over 250 officers and civilian support staff positions to provide sufficient police services in San Diego.

These solutions can’t be done on the cheap but are essential to keep our neighborhoods safe. The savings from our reform agenda, including managed competition, must be used to fund these improvements to our Police Department.

That is why I am supportive of the Department’s proposed five-year plan.  As your mayor, I’ll work with senior police department leadership to ensure our officers have the resources needed to protect our neighborhoods.


Comments 2

  1. Really???!!! Carl’s draconian fiscal philosophy is the very reason SDPD has 100 fewer officers than they had 5-years ago. I’m sure he’ll claim credit for AB340’s collateral effect of making San Diego (as a charter city with it’s own retirement system) more attractive than cities/counties in the CalPERS pension system. But, I’m confident that given enough time, Carl will eliminate the defined benefit pensions for cops and move them into 401K’s. Once that happens, the City’s police department will be worse off again.

  2. Of course, anonymous “john” opposes fiscal reforms in ANY city employee circumstances — instead allowing our runaway compensation costs to drive us into bankruptcy, as the citizens rightfully refuse to continue raising taxes for our Cadillac (double) city pensions and lifetime free city retiree healthcare — absurd costs that Carl and his allies have partially contained via reforms.

    Somehow Carl supporting such cost containment of NONpolice employees is the reason we are short of money to pay for public safety (especially police) employees. Uh huh.

    “john,” feel free to get your union thug cronies to gather “privacy stealing” signatures for yet another city sales tax increase proposition to fund your legalized theft. Put it on the ballot — I’d LOVE to kick your sorry butts around the block again at the polls on this matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.