Sarah Boot – Progressive?
Oh yeah, and by progressive, that means a person of the left as opposed to a person of pallor.
Sarah Boot is running against quasi-incumbent Lorie Zapf for San Diego City Council in District 2. For full disclosure, recent redistricting moved my home from District 6 to District 2, like Zapf. I am very interested in this race. San Diego City Beat has this to say about Boot:
In 2010, she was selected as a fellow for the San Diego chapter of the New Leaders Council, which aims to train “progressive political entrepreneurs” for leadership roles, elected office among them. She’s also a founding member of Run Women Run, a local organization focused on getting politically progressive women in office. [emphasis mine.]
On her campaign web site, Boot promises to work for neighborhoods and public safety. Both Mayor Faulconer, the former Council-member from the district, and Council-member Zapf made this a priority in their campaigns as well. You have to go to her issues page to find the evidence of left-leaning tendencies. Even what you find there is pretty mild.
I will work to provide all San Diegans with good paying jobs in industries of the future not dead end jobs of the past. These are jobs in “green” industries such as alternative energy like solar and wind and retrofitting our public buildings and “blue” industries that take advantage of our port and ocean front maritime trades. Whether its promoting “green” or “blue” technologies or championing our local biotech businesses, San Diego needs a city government that is forward thinking and uses our economic development dollars wisely.
But there is not a word about the key issues which have divided the city council of late, the minimum wage debate, the zoning in Bario Logan, pension reform, the hotel tax, linkage fees nor managed competition. So a little research is in order. By the way, green jobs are a myth. I notice that the left has always had a tendency to hide their positions, but I digress.
On the issue of the linkage fee, dumbest tax ever, Boot made her support known in the OB town council debate. Her stance on the linkage fee is disqualifying, in my opinion. I can’t find reference to Boot’s stance on managed competition, although Zapf vigorously supported the concept in the PB and Clairemont forums. On the issue of the minimum wage, Boot makes her progressive bona fides clear by supporting some sort of increase in an interview with Frank Gormlie in the OBRag. She also discusses the importance of climate disruption change (maybe she hadn’t gotten the memo) and other progressive shibboleths. In the same interview she exhibits hostility towards outsourcing, although not the same as managed competition, might certainly be an indicator.
If Sarah Boot is elected to the city council, we can expect major intrusions by city government and a very union friendly 6-3 Democrat majority on the council. It means no to any more pension reform, managed competition or any other efforts to keep city costs under control. Further, plastic bag bans, changes to how we get our electricity, raising minimum wages so my son can lose his job and general interference in our lives will be on its way. I think Lorie Zapf has been great on the City Council, but even if she had been mediocre, I would still be endorsing her over Sarah Boot.
# # #
What You Should Be Reading
- Giving us hope for this generations of collegiate students, UNC Sophomore Timothy Bame writes about the myth of clean energy. 45% of the electricity generated in the United States is through the use of coal. It is also by far the cheapest form of electricity and the easiest to obtain, yet it remains in plentiful supply. (H/T College Insurrection). I would add that the shift to natural gas has reduced carbon emissions by more than any “green” technology ever will.
- Meanwhile, despite repeated claims that we need all that solar and wind because of peak oil, America is on a path to achieve its highest rates of petroleum production, evah!
- State Rep Joseph Gibbons of FL points out that California’s net-metering policies are subsidizing solar power providers because they avoid paying for the electrical that they depend upon. As someone who has recently received some quotes for solar, I worry that a change to a rationale policy for connecting to the grid will change my savings calculations.