Archive for the ‘Brian Brady’ Category
The Republican Liberty Caucus of San Diego voted to endorse the candidacy of State Senator Joel Anderson (Alpine) for District Two on the San Diego County Board of Supervisors in the 2016 election.
The Second District covers most of East County. It extends to the Imperial County line in the east, encompassing the communities of Poway, Julian and Ramona to the north, includes the cities of Santee, La Mesa, Lemon Grove and El Cajon, the inincorporated areas of Alpine, Lakeside and Spring Valley, and all land to the Mexican border (including the communities of Jamul, Dulzura, and Potrero). Geographically, it is the largest district in the county and serves more than 625,000 citizens. District Two is currently represented by decades-long incumbent Dianne Jacob.
The County Board of Supervisors ruled against free speech today. Let me amend that; every Supervisor, except Board Chairman Bill Horn, limited your right to support candidates through a political party.
Horn registered his expected pro-freedom response. He started the conversation by saying that he opposes any limits to free speech. After public testimony (from five speakers and 16 non-speakers, against the contribution limit proposal, and exactly NO people supporting it), initiating Supervisor Ron Roberts amended his original proposal. He increased the contribution limit stating that his original number was too low.
Tom Shepard is up to his old shenanigans again. Shepard-backed Supervisor Ron Roberts is introducing a proposal to limit candidate donations from political parties in San Diego County. Guess why? To protect two of Shepard’s other clients, up for re-election in 2016: Dianne Jacob and Greg Cox. It also gives Shepard a chance to make MORE money by forming and/or consulting for “independent expenditure committees” (also known as attack ad slush funds).
In my last two years as an Executive Board member of the Republican Party of San Diego County (a position from which I’ve resigned), I noticed a growing alienation between “rank-and-file” Republican volunteers and our County Central Committee (an elected position which I still hold). The most engaged Republican voters think we push candidates on them rather than listen to them. I covered this in my series about the RPSDC.
This isn’t just a San Diego problem.
Breitbart News reports that political consultant Pat Caddell sees this happening nationwide:
In my last installment, I suggested that there was only one approach to grow our party for the 2016 election cycle — change the endorsement process. I said:
“Our endorsement process is broken — it alienates a lot of people. After reading through this entire series, I’ve concluded that two things could change us for the better: getting people elected to the Central Committee with no financial stake in the party endorsements (which can’t be attempted until 2017) or changing the way we endorse candidates (which can be changed in the next month). The latter is the only option we have this election cycle.”
A Case For Changing The Republican Party of San Diego County — Part Six: Changing the Endorsement Process
We’ve had some great discussions in this series and I spent a lot of time discussing the Volunteer Neighborhood Precinct Captains. I’ve served on two other county committees (Camden County, NJ and Maricopa County, AZ) before serving on the San Diego Committee. In those committees, the Precinct Captain was elected and was the basic building block of party governance and operations.
Take a look at what’s happening in Arizona. John McCain is trying to purge the “tea party” precinct committee captains:
This is a long series so let me summarize it before we start to talk about how to reconcile irreconcilable differences.
In the first installment, I posited that the Republican Party of San Diego County’s (RPSDC) celebrated “San Diego Model” was, in fact, not being followed. The comments that followed suggested early endorsements alienated people in the primaries, causing them to “drop out” of the general elections.
Like many libertarians, I am appalled at what’s happening to our police forces in this country. Like many conservatives, I am saddened that people have lost trust in law enforcement.
I was furious that Kelly Thomas’ killers were set free. While I agree with the grand jury’s decision in the Michael Brown shooting, I wonder why that cop had to chase a cigar thief. When I watched the Eric Garner video, I was stunned that a stupid cigarette tax escalated the way it did. Finally. watching a Cleveland cop shoot a 12-year old boy with a toy gun disgusted me.
There is an ongoing national struggle for leadership in the Republican Party: business establishment vs. populist conservatives.
Populist conservatives led the Republican House victory in 2010, infighting between the two factions produced a national loss in 2012, and an aggressive establishment victory snared the Senate just last month. In California, that struggle was highlighted by the Tim Donnelly v. Neel Kashkari gubernatorial primary last June. Republican volunteers loved Donnelly but the establishment, big-money donors backed Kashkari (then abandoned him in the race against Brown).
What happened to the celebrated “San Diego Model”? The premise of the San Diego Model is that endorsed candidates focus on messaging and communicating with Democrats and Independents, while the Republican Party of San Diego County (RPSDC) focuses on turning out the vote for endorsed Republican candidates.
One in three San Diego County voters is a registered Republican. Approximately 36 percent are registered Democrats and almost 26 percent opt to decline from stating a partisan identity. Republican registration used to be much higher, but voters started moving away from RPSDC in 2008. Why?
…so offered my friend Michael Schwartz, in a satirical comment to my Facebook post:
Just got a greeting card in the mail offering me “Warmest Wishes for the Winter Holiday” from an escrow company in Northern California. Milquetoast. You gotta try harder than that.
Let’s start with this: Offering me the white-washed “Warmest wishes for the Winter Holidays” doesn’t make you politically correct, it makes you personally disinterested in me. Let me explain.
I don’t subscribe to the #WarOnChristmas meme. I’m sure it’s happening but it ain’t bothering me. What annoys me is that people are too scared to be wrong in what should be a nice gesture.
Who is the most important person in the Republican Party of San Diego County?
If you said “The Chairman,” you don’t understand grass roots politics. Our Chairman is a “super-volunteer” and he works his butt off, but a Committee Chairman isn’t the most important person in a Republican organization. The Chairman leads the Committee; the Committee governs the Party organization.
San Diego is a Center-Right County
Consider this: Five of the seven Republican candidates for statewide offices earned a majority of the San Diego County vote in this past election. That’s good news for the Republican Party of San Diego County — it means that County voters are still of center-right ideology. But consider this comment, from Rostra awhile back:
“As for San Diego County 2014, its largest city still has a Democratic majority on the City Council, its second largest city now has a Democratic supermajority on the City Council, including a Democratic Mayor and the largest school district has a Board comprised entirely of Democrats as does the largest Community College District Board.
The Republican Liberty Caucus of San Diego (RLCSD) was founded in 2012 to advance individual rights, limited government and free enterprise within the San Diego area, the state of California and the Republican Party. It is an officially chartered chapter of the Republican Liberty Caucus, founded in 1991 as a 527 political organization.
This new organization grew in numbers during the Spring and Summer of 2014. Its local Board of Directors boasts prominent business leaders, a West Point and an Annapolis graduate, attorneys, and entrepreneurs. Its membership includes county co-chairs for a Republican Presidential campaign, nominated RNC delegates, and county co-chairs for a California gubernatorial campaign.
A huge victory was won for liberty in the San Diego City Council Chamber two days ago — the rent seekers lost the battle to keep competition down. The San Diego City Council voted to lift the artificial “cap” on city licensing of taxicabs.
You might ask, “Why the hell is the City licensing driving? Doesn’t the State do that?”– that would be a fair question. For decades, a small number of businesses have leveraged government to restrict competition in the taxicab industry. The City charges an excessive licensing fees and then creates an artificial market by capping the number of licenses issued. The restricted market is so inefficient that the “medallions” trade for as much as fifty times purchase value in a secondary market.
The Bob Filner fiasco certainly has local media scared. I noticed it in the special Mayoral election when they asked Faulconer and Alvarez the silliest of interview questions. The media are worried they might not properly vet candidates, so rumor, innuendo, and accusations get reported first and investigated later.
Mike Slater thought differently when he refused to air an accusation by a former Carl DeMaio aide last June. That aide told a story which was part Ben Hueso and part Bob Filner. That story, released days prior to the June primary election, couldn’t be verified so Slater passed. Months later, the accuser brought the story to CNN and local media jumped on it. The San Diego Police investigated the claim and passed it on to the District Attorney — it was dismissed because, like Mike Slater decided in June, it lacked evidence.
A late decision and a large personal loan to his campaign made Encinitas Council candidate Alan “Lerch” Lerchbacker look like a long shot candidate But a divided electorate, support from the surging Mayoral favorite Kristin Gaspar, and a mid-campaign endorsement change from the Republican Party of San Diego County might propel “Lerch” to victory.
Early voting, as of October 28, 2014, in Encinitas has a slight Republican edge according to The San Diego Group. Republicans have returned 2329 ballots, Democrats have returned 2237 ballots, and DTS and others have returned just shy of 1500. Normally, that would seem par for the course and not signify any advantage for “Lerch” but a few extraordinary things are happening in this campaign:
Will Pacific View Be a Defining Issue in the Encinitas Mayor’s Race Between Tony Kranz and Kristin Gaspar?
The Encinitas’ City Council decision to purchase the former Pacific View Elementary School is proving to be an issue in the Encinitas Mayor’s race. Deputy Mayor (and Democrat) Tony Kranz fully supports the decision to purchase property for close to $10 million, before the School District put it out to bid in a public auction. Mayor (and Republican) Kristin Gaspar voted against the purchase, claiming that the price tag was too high.
The “leaders ” in the “Big G” gay political movement owe Carl DeMaio an apology. After decades of chastising straight America for holding homophobic stereotypes about gay men, they refuse to stand up for a small g gay candidate, while similar tactics are used against him. They were silent when DeMaio’s Mayoral campaign opponents tried to dig up dirt on him and shop it to San Diego media, they guffawed when State Senator Ben Hueso made a ridiculous accusation about a men’s room encounter, and piled on when a now debunked lie about sexual harassment was advanced by a dismissed campaign staffer.
Citizens need closure on the recent allegations against Carl DeMaio. Last week, Todd Bosnich accused the former San Diego City Council Member and U.S. House candidate of sexual harassment. If true, DeMaio has no business holding public office.
The timing of this claim is suspect. The accuser’s decision to lodge the complaint in the media, rather than through law enforcement, suggests that he is more interested in influencing an election result rather than seeking justice. DeMaio categorically denies the accusations.
The politics of envy is on full display in Illinois, Connecticut, and Kansas elections this cycle. Their genesis was the attacks the Obama team levied at Mitt Romney. This quote, from this Politico article, boils the strategy down to a few sentences:
“What private equity companies do and their business makes for a very easy target for people to twist and bend and simplistically attack,” said Bill Daley, President Barack Obama’s former chief of staff who briefly ran for Illinois governor against Quinn last year. “It’s tailor-made for a political consultant to attack — all you need is a few facts — you don’t need a lot of them. You sure don’t need truth.”
Let’s start with this current bid of madness, about doing away with gender identification in Nebraska grade schools:
Nebraska school district has instructed its teachers to stop referring to students by “gendered expressions” such as “boys and girls,” and use “gender inclusive” ones such as “purple penguins” instead.
“Don’t use phrases such as ‘boys and girls,’ ‘you guys,’ ‘ladies and gentlemen,’ and similarly gendered expressions to get kids’ attention,” instructs a training document given to middle-school teachers at the Lincoln Public Schools.
“Create classroom names and then ask all of the ‘purple penguins’ to meet on the rug,” it advises.
Let’s start with this; there is no “tea party”. There is a “tea party movement,” there are “tea party groups,” there are “tea party activists” and there are “people who agree with tea party principles.” In that tea party movement, there are libertarians, social conservatives, immigration activists, fiscal conservatives, Second Amendment defenders, and other conservative-leaning Americans.
I spoke today, to a classroom of young people at a private high school in San Diego. This is my second year as a speaker for the ACLU-sponsored “Constitution Day”. Last year, I presented to 60 middle school students in Chula Vista so I was looking forward to changing my presentation for a high school class. Here were some of my observations:
The U-T reports that the Vista City Council granted Dollar General a permit to build a store in its kingdom but decided what it can or can’t sell. Let’s look at quotes from both sides of the alcohol permitting process.
“Combine those two factors and there is no way that additional (alcohol) sales would add anything to the city of Vista,”
“I am not willing to limit somebody’s ability to sell their retail wares because they weren’t first in line in the neighborhood,”