Archive for the ‘B-Daddy’ Category
I was challenged on Twitter two days ago by Benjamin Katz as to why immigration is my number one issue. So I thought that a little recap is in order.
1. It’s about fairness and the rule of law. The culture of this country is sliding towards conditions that foster dictatorship. Specifically, how one is treated before the law depends on one’s circumstances. Whether it is Hillary getting away with blatantly illegal activity on her server or Obama unlawfully granting amnesty to millions of illegals; were on a path where consequences for illegal activity is determined by a political elite ruled by a donor class.
Single family housing that are used for short-term vacation rentals through web services such as Airbnb or VRBO have gotten negative attention here in San Diego of late. Even though the complainants point to specific behaviors they dislike, the underlying tone of the discussion is that they don’t like the sort of people who come to America’s Finest City to vacation.
As long as the voters of San Diego are willing to punish politicians for subsidizing a new Chargers stadium, or as long as the law is interpreted that such subsidies require a public vote, there is no way that the Chargers can remain in San Diego for much longer. Numerous studies have shown that the value of a football stadium to a city is never more than the amount of money plowed into subsidies, so there will never be a viable economic argument for a new stadium, and I think San Diegans understand that. See Pacific-Standard for a great summary of the issue in general in America.
From the U-T:
The City Council voted 6-3 on Monday to reject plans to build three homes on the Jessop estate in Point Loma, adding to the single one built in 1926.
. . .
“When you have properties this big, you shouldn’t be putting the houses 12 feet apart,” said Council President Sherri Lightner, adding that the design would make firefighting difficult. “I have grave concerns about public safety.”
Councilwoman Lorie Zapf, whose district includes Point Loma, said she could support adding development to the site, but not this particular proposal for La Crescentia Drive because of the locations of the new homes.
Monday’s council vote was actually in favor of a resident’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the proposed subdivision last June.
. . .
The owner of the property, Carolyn Kutzke, has been trying for several years to develop it.
There is a petition on change.org asking the mayor and the City Council to ban short-term rentals in the city of San Diego. I’m not going to link to the petition because I don’t want you to sign it. A total ban would be ridiculous and an invitation for people to just flaunt the law. However, there are some issues that ought to be dealt with regarding short-term rentals. Some negative comments about short term rentals from my neighbors on Next Door.
I walked in today’s Raise the Balloon event down Morena Blvd. It was a great day for a walk and by my estimate, about 350 people showed up; joining at various points along the walk. I didn’t learn much new about the problem, except the assertion that there is a lot of obfuscation at city hall as to who has the authority over this proposed change to zoning. Allegedly, the planning commission has nothing to do with this, according to one of my co-marcher. The change is a set-up, to automatically kick in when the trolley extension is built and blame it on SB 375 mandates to allow politicians to avoid responsibility for a clearly unpopular move. More research is needed to judge the accuracy of this assertion.
In an earlier post, I laid bare the hypocrisy and mendacity of the effort to rezone Morena. Saturday, September 27, at 10:00 a.m., you have the chance to protest the green grifters and their plans for a whoreticulture of high-rises in Bay Park. There will be a march along Morena by the “folks” whose neighborhood is under siege on the unproven theory that density is destiny, as far as carbon is concerned.
From the Raise the Balloon web site:
I live in the Bay Park area of San Diego as many of you know. During the Council District 2 race, I became aware of a controversy regarding a change to height limits to buildings along Morena Blvd, which runs north-south in parallel with I-5 on the west side of Mission Bay. Since both main candidates opposed the changes, I figured this was a dead on arrival proposal and didn’t think much more about it. However, I continue to see homemade signs and professional yard signs in my neighborhood, which piqued my interest. Here is the issue in a nutshell: In order to meet SB 375 targets to reduce per capita emissions from vehicles, the city planners are proposing to build high density, six story condominiums near the future trolley stations along Morena Blvd. Screw that, to coin a phrase. As a current resident of the area, I am going to suffer massive traffic congestion to meet ephemeral emissions targets as no provision will be made for the influx of traffic. No way will a majority of new residents be using the trolley to get to work downtown. Hence the inevitable traffic mess. Because the plan is intended to “reduce emissions,” there won’t be any more lanes on Morena Blvd, Clairemont Drive or Sea World Drive to handle all the extra traffic. (Have you tried to get on I-5 north from Sea World Drive during rush hour, even now?)
San Diego’s 10News is reporting that a campaign to repeal an expected rise in the minimum wage is being organized by the San Diego Small Business Coalition. (I urge you to “like” their Facebook page.)
San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer vetoed the measure, but the San Diego City Council is expected to override it. If that happens, Jason Roe, spokesman for the San Diego Small Business Coalition, says he has already begun to fundraise and has “substantial commitments from small businesses.”
Roe says the group is ready to launch a ballot drive to repeal the hike. Some 34,000 signatures must be gathered in a month to get it on the ballot in June 2016.
The U-T reported this morning on San Diego city government’s failure to shut down illegal medical marijuana shops. To be clear, there are currently no legal medical marijuana shops in the city.
The case is instructive on the results of the failure of the rule of law, including the failure to pass implementing laws that unwelcome, but legal activity to proceed. Councilmember Ed Harris wants a process that shines the light of transparency on the efforts to close the illegal shops.
The proposal comes as the abundance of illegal dispensaries has begun adding turbulence to the already complex approval process facing applicants trying to open the city’s first legal pot shops.
The Washington Post blog post about “white” Americans getting an Ebola serum reminds me of an old joke about the Post. The Almighty gave the editors of the Post a call to let them know that the world was ending the next day. True to form the WaPo headline read: “World to End – Women and Minorities Impacted Most.”
Distribution of the serum to Americans has jack to do with the fact that they are white and everything to do with the fact that they are Americans. The serum is being developed by an American company, Mapp Biopharmaceutical, based right here in San Diego, I am proud to say.
My income is fixed but decent, so I choose to employ maids and gardeners. My choice results in extra coin in the pocket of people whom I know are not near as well off as myself. The hard truth about a minimum wage increase of the size being contemplated by the San Diego City Council is that I can’t really afford to continue to employ both. So who should I fire, the maids or the gardeners? This is the hard truth about the minimum wage. My income is set by law, it’s not going to change, so those are my choices to deal with rising costs. Those arguing for the minimum wage will tell me that I am not paying those people enough, but when someone loses that income, I’ll bet they would prefer that I still employed them. Further, I won’t be the only one making such a choice; some people are going to lose their jobs with a minimum wage hike.
. . . Campaign Flyer. Who’d a thunk it? This flyer showed up at my house.
Unions are getting involved in the San Diego City Council District 2 race and spending money to help the Libertarian candidate, Mark Schwartz. Let’s be clear, Schwartz has no chance of being elected.
If you read the fine print at the bottom, you will see that the San Diego – Imperial Counties Labor Council sponsored this flyer, along with the city Municipal Employees Association. When I saw this show up, I was immediately suspicious. I was a libertarian for a long time, and slick campaign flyers were almost always outside of the budget wherewithal of our candidates.
Oh yeah, and by progressive, that means a person of the left as opposed to a person of pallor.
Sarah Boot is running against quasi-incumbent Lorie Zapf for San Diego City Council in District 2. For full disclosure, recent redistricting moved my home from District 6 to District 2, like Zapf. I am very interested in this race. San Diego City Beat has this to say about Boot:
In 2010, she was selected as a fellow for the San Diego chapter of the New Leaders Council, which aims to train “progressive political entrepreneurs” for leadership roles, elected office among them. She’s also a founding member of Run Women Run, a local organization focused on getting politically progressive women in office. [emphasis mine.]
Bonnie Dumanis ran unopposed in her last run for District Attorney; this year she faces opponents Bob Brewer and Terri Wyatt. I am unhappy with Dumanis, but not ready to endorse an opponent. First my airing of grievances against Dumanis.
- Prior to running for mayor, Dumanis had the opportunity to make her voice heard on Proposition D, the half-cent sales tax increase; she demurred. Carl DeMaio’s strong support stood in stark contrast and was a key element in my support for his mayoral bid.
. . . If the city of San Diego passes a minimum wage hike. The San Diego City Council has taken the first step to put a separate minimum wage hike on the ballot. This is a terrible idea beyond the usual arguments against a minimum wage increase. But first, the issue with a hike at all. The argument gets made that there is some right to be paid a certain amount of money just because one work’s a full time job. It doesn’t matter if the worker’s skills can command that amount compensation. The practical effect of increasing the minimum wage is to pick some winners and some losers. Some employers have said that they would cut staff. My son makes minimum wage; I don’t want him to lose his job if his employer makes that choice to keep down labor costs. From the WSJ:
…and some of them were a tad rude.
Kevin Faulconer wearing his SDSU Aztec tie at South Clairemont Rec Center
I attended the inaugural “Meet the Mayor” session yesterday and was impressed with the Mayor’s focus. Since I can’t find any press coverage, I am providing a summary and a little editorial comment of my own. (I’m a blogger not a journolist. Misspell intentional.) I had to leave a little early, and I left a little earlier than I had to, which I will discuss later.
Mrs. Daddy and I visited Carl DeMaio’s campaign headquarters today, meeting up with family there. I got a minute to chat with DeMaio about the campaign. I told him that I appreciated his work on Proposition D and Proposition B. He related that the effort to reform county pensions in Ventura County had run into problems because of unions trying to block signature gatherers. A little research on that issue revealed that the Ventura County sheriff had joined the union protestors, which any taxpayer or advocate of free speech should find disturbing. DeMaio said that “we” had been able to get the intimidation and blocking to stop. I was not clear as to whom he was referring to, as this was not an interview.
Under the heading of “What You Should Be Reading,” Cal Watchdog.com certainly comes to mind. They have great coverage of key California state issues from what appears to be a conservative perspective, but that might be the result of all the bad governance by the lefties that run this state. Chris Reed is a frequent contributor and covers California politics with a sharp eye. He has come to the conclusion that California’s “Top Dems” want the high speed rail project killed because they aren’t applying their usual thugishness in propelling it forward. Calling it the “Dog That Didn’t Bark,” he cites two main facts. First, the handling of the initiative intended to shut down the train:
The minimum wage laws in this country are daggers to the heart of opportunity for our poorest and least skilled citizens. Those in favor argue that it helps the poor because they get paid more, and that there is no adverse impact on the economy, overall. I disagree, but want to focus on the very people that the left proposes to help, the unskilled. Take South Africa for instance. The ministry of labor sets minimum wages in various employment areas. But the labor unions in South Africa are closely allied with ruling ANC and they impose wage rates even on non-union sectors of the economy. As a consequence, there is massive unemployment in South Africa amongst the largely unskilled work force, because they are not skilled enough to be affordable to businesses.
The news of indictments involving associates of Mexican businessman Susumo Azano makes for entertaining reading. There is a trail of illegal campaign donations to various mayoral candidates funneled through a straw-donor and a social media guru. The U-T is all over the story, with the best overall description of the case published in Sunday’s paper. I also want to give credit to Dave Maass, formerly of San Diego City Beat, who first broke the story of questionable campaign contributions by Azano in 2012. The alleged motive for illegally funneling campaign contributions was so that Azano could slow down water front projects and gain a controlling interest in them after they ran into political trouble. From the U-T: